Sunday, January 30, 2011

Offseason keeper trades

OK, this is our final offseason winter meetings issue. Please vote in both polls. To read the discussion and arguments made for both sides here, please go here.



Issue 1: Should there be a penalty for offseason keeper trades? (majority)
Because there are two Yes options and one No, here is how the voting will work. If both yes votes combine to equal the majority, the one with the most will be the winner. (I.E.: OPTION 3 NO gets 5 votes, OPTION 1 YES gets 4 and OPTION 2 YES gets 3. In that case, OPTION 1 YES will be the winner.)




Issue 2: Draft picks in offseason keeper trades (8 votes needed to change)
Draft picks can never be traded in-season, but should they be allowed to be included in offseason keeper trades?




2 comments:

  1. Don't you think it would make more sense to do a runoff if the two yes's equal the no's? For example, let's say that 5 people vote no penalty, 3 vote 11th and 2 vote 16th. How would it be fair to give it to the 11th when people that voted no obviously want there to be less of a penalty. So there really would not be a majority for the 11th pick but in actuality that is what would be considered a majority to you. Just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not following you. I said if the two Yes's add up to be more than the No's.. Said nothing about tying...

    Am I misunderstanding what you're asking?

    ReplyDelete